|
Plot devices
It’s a real barrel of laughs out there at the minute. France has now banned
British border guards in Calais from using an X-ray scanner when checking
vehicles for stowaways. Apparently the scanners breach European safety laws,
and without written permission from the illegals their use is now outlawed.
Or try this one: in 2010 the British ‘kitemark’ safety standard will be torn
up and replaced by a European ‘C.E’ mark. As a result, firework displays are
now under threat, because the manufacturers must pay to have all their
products retested. As Tom Smith of the CBI explained: “Not a single person
in Britain will be made safer… but everyone will be affected by it becoming
much more expensive and bureaucratic to import fireworks.”
Or try this one, from the Guardian, Jan 18th. In the little village of
Carnon Downs, near Truro, the local drama group produced a homemade
pantomime - a mixture of Captain Hook, Robinson Crusoe and Long John Silver.
But there was a problem. The panto’s finale ended with a sword fight across
the stage.
Under Health and Safety rules, they had to register the weapons with the
police: two plastic cutlasses, six wooden swords and a toy pistol that
flicks out a flag saying ‘Bang!’… Oh, and they also needed to employ a fight
coordinator from Liverpool to supervise the fight scenes on Hook’s galleon.
Now tell me that this country hasn’t lost the plot.
Oh Yes they have!
Got talent? - Don't encourage them!
Devon Columnist Toby Landers visited a ‘non-competitive school sports day’
in Derby last year…. I’ll quote him: “I heard a teacher telling a 9 year old
girl: “We don’t do that here!” She had been running across the playing field
with a ‘racing attitude’. It was very obvious this girl had a natural talent
and I am sure everybody could see that. Was she encouraged? Not a chance. I
felt she was being patronised and put down by her school. She was told to
resume passing bean bags around and pouring water into empty buckets. What a
waste of time”.
I know how he feels. Sometimes it’s difficult to feel sympathy for these
teachers. When corporal punishment was banned and children suddenly knew
their ‘human rights’, the resultant chaos in the classroom was inevitable.
And with a generation of Wayne and Waynetta parents, themselves reared on
turkey twizzlers, pinning the headmaster against the bike-shed wall, the
only solution is to fight like a cat in a sack to get your child into one of
the few half-decent schools we have left, and risk being spied upon by your
local council.
Tony Blair didn’t hesitate to pull strings for his own children. No
bog-standard comprehensive for his lot, and when a prime minister sets an
example, who can be blamed for following?
Bog standards
Lie back and don't think of England
It’s no secret that the BBC has become dominated by progressive lefties
(which explains why its politically correct output is now virtually
unwatchable) but here’s an interesting tale.
One of UKIP’s supporters is the ex-deputy editor of Radio 4’s Today
programme. He has spent 29 years in the BBC and was editor of Newsbeat,
World Tonight, 6pm News and Today in Parliament. This man knows his onions.
He recently attended Today’s 50th birthday party in the O2 Centre next to
the London Eye.
Then he wrote to us about it. Here is part of his letter: “The event was
filled with the ‘great and the good’, Ken Livingstone, most of the Lib Dem
MPs, David Trimble, Lord and Lady Howe etc. Among the many journalists but
few Today workers, was a well-known presenter from Radio 5 Live (not sure
why he was there, but still).
‘When “Europe” cropped up he had the audacity to suggest we could do nothing
about it and like a woman being raped, should lie back and “enjoy” it. I was
so taken aback, I didn’t know what to say – without being extremely rude
that is. Regrettably that seems to be the attitude of most people in the UK.
Will they ever wake up?”
Shhhhh.......
Foregone conclusions
The Delphi Technique is a sneaky way of pushing through controversial
issues. You will find it at public enquiries, school meetings, local
government consultation exercises etc; and this guide should help you spot
it…
Their aim is to get you, the audience, to vote for a preset decision
(hospital closure, new airport, gypsy site, etc). If people believe an idea
is their own, they’ll support it. If they feel it’s being forced on them,
they’ll resist.
This so-called participation is an illusion and it works like this. They
hire a “facilitator”. Supposedly neutral and non-judgemental, but in fact
he’s on ‘their’ side. He then works the crowd, seeking out those who
disagree, making them look foolish, inept or aggressive, sending a clear
message to the rest of the audience that they’d better behave unless they
want the same treatment. This is ‘group dynamics’.
Once the opposition has been identified and alienated, the facilitator
becomes the good guy and the direction of the meeting is established without
the audience ever realising what is happening. The crowd is then broken up
into smaller groups (divide and rule) and encouraged to put down on paper
their ideas and concerns, not sharing them openly. That way nobody knows
what anyone else has written, and the final compilation of results can be
left to those running the meeting. And even if one table disagrees, they are
still in a minority.
Lynn Stuter is an education researcher in Washington State, and she lists
the way to counter the Delphi Technique. Always be charming, courteous and
pleasant. Don’t be aggressive or you will lose the audience. Don’t respond
angrily when the facilitator tries to ridicule you. Be persistent. If the
facilitator launches into a long monologue, this is done deliberately. Wait
till he finishes, then say: “You haven’t answered my question. What I asked
was…” Sometimes it helps to have friends in the crowd: “You haven’t answered
that lady’s question.” But ignore each other at tea break or they’ll soon
realise that you’re in cahoots.
As Mrs Stuter says: “Citizens believe they are contributing to the result,
but in reality the outcome has already been decided beforehand. The goal of
facilitators is to make the majority of the group members like them, and to
alienate anyone who might pose a treat to the realisation of their agenda.”
It is oddly reminiscent of the approach by Europhiles to anyone who dares to
disagree with them. Refutation by denigration, Delphi style.
The end result
Calling time
In my last post, (on the right), I wrote about the Government’s plans to
lower the blood/alcohol limit to 50 millilitres in 100 milligrams of blood.
One pint of beer could put you over the limit, let alone a slice of your
grannies “tipsy cake”. This will put us “in line with most countries in the
European Union”, so that’s alright then...
It will also administer the coup de grace to many pubs struggling to survive
after the smoking ban. All those recalcitrant smokers huddling in the street
are an affront to the puritans who run this country at the moment (though
strangely they ignore the new and sudden invasion of children into the
public bar, despite the fact that it is an offence for children to be
present in a room where alcohol is being served)…
Fear not, though. The Government is ready. The Home Office is issuing a
manual for police officers, advising how to recognise a drunk. They must
look out for “dishevelled” pub-goers, “rambling conversation”, “carelessness
with money”, “offensive language” “inappropriate behaviour”, “spilling
drinks” and “bumping into furniture”. Other giveaways are “loss of train of
thought”, “glassy eyes” or “lack of focus”…
As the Licensed Victuallers’ Association commented: “It seems ridiculous
that a trained police officer needs help in identifying someone who is
drunk. If you apply all these guidelines in the average pub any customer
could be classified as drunk.”…
Government
inebriation
Harmony prevails
The Daily Mail recently unearthed a scam
involving foreign motorists, mostly East European. Three million of them are
virtually immune from prosecution if they fail to register their vehicle
with the DVLA. This means that parking tickets can be ripped up, and bus
lanes and speed cameras ignored…
Transport for London and various councils commissioned a report in 2007 and
were stunned by the result. Half a million rogue motorists have dodged fines
(estimated 95% of offending vehicles). A spokesman for London Council
admitted: “Only around 4.5% actually pay them”….
To quote the Mail: “the number of European drivers – notably from Eastern
Europe – on the nation’s roads has doubled to three million over the past
five years. The increase is due to extra visitors and also the influx of
immigrants.”…
Nick Lester, chairman of the report, said: “We are told there is even a
fleet of Audis, BMWs and Mercedes in East London, all with Latvian
registration plates.”…
But in order to achieve EU harmonisation, British motorists travelling
abroad will soon have their details made available to foreign police forces.
Nice to see that New Labour still believes in keeping a level playing field.
And yet many of you will still vote for them. Beyond belief.
Be Plateful
Walk on water
In 1995 a BBC news journalist was
interviewing a member of the Conservative Government: “Minister, could it be
that Britain might actually prosper outside Europe?” “Impossible”, came the
spluttering reply. “We don’t live on an island.” Well actually we do live on
an island. Walk far enough in any direction and even a senior Tory will get
their feet wet. And living on that island has proved jolly handy for most of
the time (apart from one little glitch in 1066 or thereabouts). What I find
most disturbing is that UKIP has been warning about the EU for the last
decade, and the political parties and media have waved it away, dismissing
it as xenophobia or racism. Now the sky is full of chickens coming home to
roost, and Westminster politicians are suddenly waking up to the fact that
membership of the EU means surrendering our rights to self-government. We
cannot deport EU criminals. We cannot deport terrorists if their human
rights might be offended. Most of our laws are now made in Brussels, and
Gordon Brown is preparing to deliver us trussed up like a turkey, with the
words: “It’s only for a few days. Nothing to worry about.” I am reminded of
the words of Benjamin Disraeli, describing the Liberal Government of the
day: “As I sat opposite the Treasury Bench, the Ministers reminded me of one
of those marine landscapes not very unusual on the coasts of South America.
You behold a range of exhausted volcanoes: not a flame flickers on a single
pallid quest, but the situation is still dangerous. There are occasional
earthquakes, and ever and anon the dark rumbling of the sea.” He could have
been describing the Labour front bench of today.
Dripping Wet
The good the mad and the stupid
You could be forgiven for thinking that
Labour and the Tories are the same. So who to vote for? UKIP, or the Lib
Dems? Many people choose Lib Dem as a 'safe protest vote', but remember that
they want “More Europe” than the others. So if you love Brussels, you must
VOTE LIB DEM! Personally, I will avoid them like an overworked cliché. As an
example of some of their antics, we recently had MP Richard Younger-Ross
(Lib Dem, Teignbridge) wanting Britain to pull out of the Eurovision Song
Contest because the voting was skewed and unfair. (See below, right). Fine. But our membership
of the European Union is far more damaging than if Chirpy Booma Bang gets
the elbow from Eastern Europe. A sense of proportion might be useful here.
Just down the road from Mr Younger-Ross, may I present Torbay Councillor
Colin Charlwood (another Lib Dim, of course) who declared in 2006 that
Torquay’s palm trees were a health hazard; the palm leaves could scratch a
passer-by’s face or even poke out an eye. Councillor Charlwood explained:
“It’s a bit like keeping tigers. They are beautiful to look at, but you
wouldn’t want them wandering the streets”. To quote Richard Littlejohn
(Littlejohn’s Britain) “it
borders on clinical insanity – You don’t get a lot of tigers in Devon.
Councillor Charlwood clearly belongs in a padded cell wearing a jacket”…. I
couldn’t put it better myself.
Just a few votes
more
Paws for thought
In 1965 the American psychologist Martin
Seligman made a discovery… He was repeating an established experiment, which
involved sounding a bell, then giving a dog a mild electric shock. In time
the dogs associated the bell with the shock and jumped up in anticipation of
what was coming. Seligman noticed something odd. After conducting the test a
few times the dogs stopped jumping. They simply lay down and waited for the
shock, even if the kennel door was left open. They had given up hope. He
realised that when a creature believes it has no control over its situation
and whatever it does is futile, it stops fighting back. The same happened in
the concentration camps when the inmates lay down to die, and can be seen
today in floods and famines when the victims are so traumatised they are
unable to fend for themselves. This is called Learned Helplessness. I
suggest that the government has now adopted this same technique against us,
hoping that we’ll lie down and give up: they claim to be listening, but
ignore us, pursuing their own agenda. The re-named EU Treaty (read
Constitution) is a case in point. Labour’s 2005 election-winning manifesto
promised a referendum on it. But Gordon Brown has betrayed that promise, is
terrified of asking us, and clearly doesn’t give a tinker’s cuss what you
think. Seligman observed something else: Not all dogs gave up. About a third
continued to resist the shocks. In human political terms many would be
UKIP-supporters, with a make-up of resistance and independence. Are you one
of them, or have you now rolled over, paws in the air?
Shock and bore
Rich Pickings
Ten old friends met for a drink every
weekend at the pub. They usually spent £100, so they worked out a system.
The first four paid nothing. The fifth paid £1. The rest paid more according
to their wealth. The tenth (the richest) paid £59. One day the landlord came
up to them: “I’ve been thinking. You’re good customers – from now on I’m
going to cut your bill by £20. Beer for the evening will now cost £80”
They kept the same rules for paying their share, so the first four still
paid nothing. The rest divided the £20 windfall in a fair manner. They
decided to reduce the remaining six shares by the same amount. For example,
the seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7. The ninth paid £14 instead of
£18. The tenth man (the richest) paid £49 instead of £59. When they got
outside, the seventh man started to complain: “I only got £2 out of that
extra £20”. And the eighth man joined in: “That’s right. I only got three
quid back when he”, pointing to the richest man, “got £10 – it’s not fair.
The rich get all the breaks!”. The four poorest then chimed in: “The system
exploits the poor. We didn’t get anything at all”. The nine of them
surrounded the tenth and beat him to a pulp. Next week he didn’t turn up. So
the rest of them sat down for an evening’s beer. When the bill came they
couldn’t raise enough cash to pay even half.…
To quote Professor David Kamerschen, Professor of Economics at the
University of Georgia: “And that, boys and girls, journalists and college
professors, is how the tax system works. The people who pay the highest
taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack
them for being wealthy, and they may just not show up anymore. In fact they
might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is more friendly”.
Please remember that there is no such thing as “Government Money” or “EU
Funding”. It all comes from the pocket of somebody who made it in the first
place.
Quids In
Safe as houses?
The UK Government has dodgy hips, (or Home
Information Packs: a sort of Green MOT for every house in Britain, designed
to stop the icecaps melting on Mars). As usual, they planned badly, lacked
the manpower, and had temporarily restricted HIPs to 4-bedroomed houses or
larger. Again, the EU was behind it, another directive from Brussels costing
us billions every year. Typically our own government “gold-plated” it,
making things worse. Brussels originally wanted us to have new HIPs every
ten years. But Tony Blair insisted that a new Energy Performance Certificate
be commissioned every time the house is sold. (Thanks, ex-Prime Minister,
enjoy your retirement.) In a recent letter to the Western Morning News, Mike
John from Winkleigh in Devon said, “My 16th Century, grade 11 listed
farmhouse is of cob construction with a thatched roof. The leaded windows
are original and come complete with ventilation gaps, as do the doors.
Heating is via a wood-burner and Aga. The house is naturally warm in the
winter and cool in the summer, with a degree of dampness essential for its
well-being. I defy anybody outside of a yurt to compete with what I have to
buy and burn. I could conform to modern energy requirements and install
double-glazing, draught excluders and central heating. An expert from
Torridge Council would be able to advise how to put a damp course in a cob
wall and solar panels in a thatched roof. But then two things would
happen....First, a different expert from TDC would take me to court for
desecration of a listed building. Second, the house will fall down”. Mr John
is spot on, but it’s also a striking metaphor for our membership of the EU,
which introduced this expensive lunacy in the first place.
Crippling
Food for thought
Being a rural animal, the mole keeps
“banging on” about the destruction of British farming and makes no apologies
for that. Hitler’s U-boats nearly won the war, because they cut off most of
our food supplies showing how food security is vital. The problem with our
urban-based New Labour government is that it still thinks that bacon comes
from Sainsburys. Take the dairy industry (why not? everyone else has). We
once had the Milk Marketing Board. A monopoly that worked, just like the
Post Office; and both were crippled by the EU. The Post Office still has
another three years or so before it finally dies. But the Milk Marketing
Board is already dead, gone, and a dusty memory, along with most dairy
farming. A case in point. Her Majesty the Queen is patron of the Ayrshire
Cattle Society. But now even she is admitting defeat and selling up. The
Windsor Ayrshire herd has grazed Home Park on the Windsor Estate for 56
years, but now it’s up for grabs. A Royal spokesman said: “There have been
significant losses over several years, with milk prices failing to cover the
high cost of production”. The price was 19p a litre, but production costs
were at least 22p. The Competition Commissioner is investigating the low
prices paid to farmers by supermarkets and processing companies, but many
farmers are reluctant to give evidence to the inquiry, fearing that they
will lose contracts. It makes you wonder though: with such suicidally low
prices the long-term prospects are about as appealing as a Glastonbury
portaloo. If I was a dairy farmer I’d be greatly tempted to give most of the
supermarkets a spring-loaded V-sign from the hip…and go into yoghurt.
Fair Trade
National Giveaway
Thomas Llewellyn Jones owns a Cardiff fish and chippie named ‘Llew’s
Takeaway’. Mistaking him for a Chinese, Ashuk Miah an ‘advocate’ of the
Newport Immigration Advice Centre, sent him a business letter in April 2007.
Before I quote the exact words of this advert, please move heavy objects out
of reach, lest you feel a sudden urge to throw them out the window. The
letter introduces NIAC as: “an independent immigration advisory service for:
Advice and application on how to bring your elderly parents or relatives to
visit United Kingdom… Advice on how to bring people on work permit… On how
to bring newly married wife or husband to UK… On how to bring students to
UK… On how to bring elderly people to UK for medical treatment… Application
to stay in UK indefinitely if you entered as a newly married spouse….
Application to extend present stay in UK if a visitor…. Application for
naturalisation as a British Citizen.”. Miah concludes with the comforting
news: “If any of the above applications are refused, I can lodge an appeal
on your behalf”. And the depressing truth is that Miah is right. Our
Government has surrendered control of our borders (partly thanks to the EU,
partly to the insane Human Rights Act, also EU-inspired), hence businesses
like the Newport Immigration Advice Centre. I never thought that I would
quote Enoch Powell, but here we go: On Britain’s immigration policy (and
this was 30 years ago): “It is like watching a nation heaping up its own
funeral pyre”. I now have a feeling that Powell might have been right.
Everyone's a winner
Bragging rights
Billy Bragg, (far-leftwing singer and political campaigner), makes a strange
bed-fellow for the Bishop of Southwark, (drunken behaviour at a London
party, you may recall), Baroness Shirley Williams, and Cardinal
Murphy-O’Connor, head of the Roman Catholic Church. But surprisingly they
came together on 7th May 2007 in Trafalgar Square to launch the “Strangers
into Citizens” campaign… The campaign proposes that all migrants who have
been in Britain for more than four years should be given a 2-year work
permit, then given indefinite leave to remain, if they sit an English test
and can produce references…. They were not alone. Thousands of supporters
assembled, armed with placards reading: “ABOLISH ALL RACIST IMMIGRATION
CONTROLS” and “NO-ONE IS ILLEGAL”… As useful as lipstick on a pig, this is
an amnesty parading as a solution. And it will fail. Italy and Spain have
each granted five amnesties in the last 20 years. All of them resulted in a
further wave of immigrants. Here in Britain we have possibly one million
illegal immigrants, let alone hundreds of thousands legally from EU states
such as Poland, Rumania etc. Only UKIP voted to prevent this…. Even now,
across the Channel the French are busily erecting Camp Sangatte Mk2. We have
had enough warnings. The effects upon the NHS, social housing, low wages,
sexploitation, working class anger, and urban crime are huge and increasing.
The last thing we need is to advertise to the world: “Come on in – Billy
Bragg said it’s OK”…
Citizen Smith of
Burton Bradstock
Bin there - not doing that
How ironic. I see that 'Bin' Bradshaw MP now wants us to have our refuse
collected every fortnight. As Council Tax spiralled out of control, the rest
of us could at least console ourselves with the thought: “Oh well, at least
they take away the rubbish”. Now they won’t even take the bins on time. It
proves that New Labour is still the ‘tax and spend’ party. “If it moves
(particularly in four-wheel-drive) then tax it. If it doesn’t move, tax it
anyway. The idiots’ll pay”… The real difference is that at least Old Labour
actually cared when they inevitably messed everything up because they
couldn’t run a bath. 'Bin' Bradshaw’s lot merely smile and ignore. As Peter
Hitchens once wrote: “We are governed by people who despise us”. The UK
Independence Party is totally committed to weekly rubbish collections. It is
one of the basic core services expected from a council, and no amount of
weasel words from 'Bin' Bradshaw and his chums will alter that. The British
people are paying through the nose for a bad service that is getting worse,
and the sooner this utterly useless government is swept away the better for
everyone… with the possible exception of Ben Bradshaw MP, who will lose his
job. But at least he will get his bins emptied once a week, so he shouldn’t
be too downcast.
What you wheelie
wheelie want
Setting the record straight
Sometimes it’s very important to get things on record.
A friend of mine came across the words “Phone Bill” written in red ink in
his diary. In his own words: “I knew seven or eight Bills but I couldn’t
tell which one it was. In the end I thought stuff it and forgot all about
it. Three weeks later BT told me they’d cut me off if I didn’t pay up.
That’s when I decided to write everything down properly from now on”. But
there are exceptions to this. One local authority recently erected a sign
above a communal swimming pool. The sign read: “This has been designated the
shallow end”. There was no corresponding notice at the deep end. Perhaps
they thought you would find that out for yourself? Or take John Hipkin,
former Lib Dem mayor of Cambridge. Responding to Government plans to build
47,000 new homes in his area, he pointed out that the city needed more
3-and-4 bedroomed houses for families. This was a bad mistake in today’s
lunatic asylum of political correctness. The Lesbian, Gay, and Transsexual
Group on the Council then demanded an official apology from Mr Hipkin for
committing “Hetero-sexism - discrimination towards non-heterosexuals due to
cultural bias”. In true waffle-speak the leader of Cambridge Council, Mr
Nimmo-Smith, said: “His remarks were capable of being interpreted as
non-inclusive”. Read the above, and weep for a civilisation dying not with a
bang but a whimper.
The Queens English
The mirror doesn't lie
At a private girl’s school in Washington DC, the janitor faced a tricky
problem. The girls, some as young as 12, were putting on lipstick and then
pressing their lips to the mirror, leaving dozens of tiny lip-prints. Every
night the Janitor scrubbed them off. Every morning they would reappear….
The Principal took action. She summoned the girls and the Janitor to a
meeting in the washroom, and explained that the lip-prints were difficult to
remove and posed a real problem for the cleaning staff…. To show the girls
how much effort it took to clean the mirrors every night she asked the
Janitor to give a demonstration…
He took out a long-handled squeegee, dipped it into the toilet, and cleaned
the mirror with it. There have been no more lip-prints on the mirrors since
then. As someone once said: There are teachers. And then there are
educators.
Kiss and tell
Brown is not the new black
If you’re one of those who think that Gordon Brown would make a great Prime
Minister then we’re about to part company. Mr Brown is certainly a clever
man, and very lucky, but he has single-handedly destroyed Britain’s pensions
industry, and for that he can never be forgiven.
In 1997 he was warned that taxing private pensions would rob funds of
£12-billion. Following a Freedom of Information request by the Daily Mail
newspaper, Treasury archive documents clearly show that Mr Brown realised
that he could increase his coffers by £11.6-billion in the first two years,
all at the expense of pensions savers. The Treasury pinned their hopes on a
rise in the stock market to plug the gap. Instead share prices plummeted in
2001/2002, and the proverbial hit the revolving air-agitator.
We now have a crisis leaving huge shortfalls in pensions, forcing hundreds
of firms to wind up their final salary schemes, all caused by this
apparently prudent Chancellor. In December 2005 the Pensions Commission
(headed by Lord Turner) warned: “Voluntary private pension provision is not
growing; rather it is in serious and irreversible decline”.
If an orderly transition of power in New Labour results in this man ever
becoming Prime Minister, (something that remains in doubt), then please
leave the door unlocked when you leave. It saves the squatters damaging the
mechanism when they arrive.
In the red
Mood music
I don’t think I’m divulging State Secrets when I tell you that UKIP
historically gets its support 25% from Labour voters, 25% from Tory, and the
remaining 50% from Lib-Dems and those who don’t normally take an interest in
politics. But things have recently changed, and UKIP has welcomed an influx
of disillusioned Tories who have suddenly realised that there is no
difference between Cameron and Blair. And not all of them have been peers of
the realm or high-profile advisors to Ken Clark. Don’t take it from me. Here
is a recent letter to the Independent: “Sir, I despair of the Conservatives.
They spurned at least three chances to appoint sensible David Davis as their
leader, and have lumbered themselves with this namby-pamby, touchy-feely,
pseudo-evangelical Tony Blair Mk2; just when we’re sick to death of Blair….
It’s the UKIP for me. Brian Rushton”. Hardly surprising really. David
Cameron has utterly failed to demolish Labour for its neglect of our Armed
Forces, wrecking of a prosperous economy, high taxes, destruction of
personal pensions, rising interest rates, chaos in the NHS, failure of
schools to teach children even how to read, and collapse of our borders
through uncontrolled immigration and insane multiculturalism, not to mention
the general breakdown of law and order; all of it to the accompaniment of a
descending ground bass of subservience to Brussels which makes 80% of our
laws and costs us a fortune in membership. If you’re looking for an antidote
for New Labour you won’t find it in David Cameron, I’m afraid. He’s far too
busy hugging hoodies or glaciers…. No, Nigel Farage, leader of UKIP…he’d be
your man.
Striking the
right note
Goosing the gander
The UK Independence Party has just been ordered to surrender £363,697 to the
Electoral Commission because the gentleman who originally gave them the
money – Alan Bown - had dropped off the electoral roll at the time he wrote
the cheque. Mr Bown lives in Kent, not the Bahamas. He is a British
businessman, employing British workers, and pays taxes and business rates in
Britain. He is not a tax-exile nor a foreign donor (the reason these rules
were brought in). Every donation to UKIP was properly recorded and reported.
The decision to take this money for what was merely a clerical error is
deeply disturbing, verging on Stalinist. It does nothing for British
democracy and is rightly seen by the public as a politically inspired attack
on this small but growing Party. It also reflects badly on the Electoral
Commission, bringing them into disrepute in the public eye. This was a
classic “stitch up”, as one member of the public – not a UKIP member - told
me on the telephone the other day; and every caller echoed this. They were
furious. People are not stupid; they recognise skulduggery when they see it.
I believe the Commission to be guilty of double standards. Perhaps they
should take a closer look at our Prime Minister, who makes a habit of taking
tea and questions at 10 Downing Street with the Metropolitan Police every
Thursday afternoon? Or consider the case of Michael Brown who recently gave
£2.4 million to the Liberal Democrats; this came from his firm “5th Avenue
Partners”. But under election law company donations can only be accepted
from companies “carrying on business in Britain”. Individual donors must
also be registered to vote in Britain. Michael Brown was not. He has since
been jailed for two years for committing perjury and for making a false
passport application… This is rather more sinister than an innocent clerical
error made by UKIP’s Alan Bown. Yet amazingly the Lib Dems have been allowed
to keep the £2.4 million. If you are getting a distinct smell of fish, then
that makes an absolute minimum of two of us.
Ruffling the
feathers
Losing your sense of direction
Christian graves traditionally face eastwards, in the belief that the Second
Coming of Jesus will be from that direction. But headstones at the new
£2.5-million High Wood Cemetery in Bulwell, Nottinghamshire, will be plotted
to face northeast, in line with Islamic faith. Moslems believe that the dead
look over their shoulder to the holy city of Mecca, in Saudi Arabia towards
the southeast…
Nottingham Christians who want to be buried facing east (in the direction of
Jerusalem) will now have to pay the Council for “extra maintenance”. The C.
of E.(at last standing up for its beliefs) has finally spoken out: the Rev
David Gray, from St John’s Church, Bulwell, said: “All faiths should have
their beliefs respected… It is an evolving cemetery and should be made for
people of all faiths and certainly people of Christian faiths”…
Rachel Farmer, spokeswoman for the Diocese of Southwell and Nottingham,
added: “Positioning all the graves in the direction of Mecca conflicts with
the long-standing Christian burial tradition of graves facing towards the
east. We believe the people of Nottingham should have the opportunity to
follow the Christian burial traditions if they choose to and the Christian
faith should not be discriminated against in this way. The 2001 census
showed that 70% of the population considered themselves Christian”…
Nottingham Council was unrepentant: “In the first phase of development it
has been agreed that the graves will face north-east. For people of Muslim
faith this fits in with a religious requirement, but it will also ensure a
tidy appearance for the site as a whole”…
It seems that even in death, the British majority must give way to the
demands of a vociferous and belligerent minority. C’est la vie, I suppose.
West meets east
Hot Air Cooling
I am finally cured of Global Warming…
It came just before Christmas, listening to an interview with a
climatologist on Radio 4’s Today programme. I didn’t catch the great man’s
name, but that’s probably irrelevant. With great solemnity he announced that
methane from the rear of farmyard cows was “a not inconsiderable factor in
Global Warming”. For me, this was the final breaking point (if you’ll pardon
the pun).
Yes, the Earth is warming up at the moment, with ice-caps melting and
dormice waking in December, but the point about Climate Change is that
climates change; it’s in their nature. The Romans were growing oranges in
Kent 2,000 years ago, and had vineyards as far north as Yorkshire. As for
rising sea levels, Isle Brewers, Isle Abbots, and Athelney on the Somerset
levels were, indeed, once islands; and Wareham was the Roman’s main port on
the South West coast. Today you are lucky to get to Wareham drawing 6ft of
water on a big tide, and Roman ships drew far more than that.
In 1275 Danish explorers discovered Greenland and gave it that name because
it was green and they could cultivate corn there. From 1500 to 1700 there
was a mini ice-age, hence the paintings of skaters enjoying themselves on
the frozen River Thames.
The icecaps on Venus are apparently melting at the same rate as those on
Earth, without the benefit of the internal combustion engine.
In the 1970s, scientists warned of a new Ice Age. When that didn’t happen
they switched to the ozone layer, which is now repairing itself. Today,
academics who need cash for a research grant, must sign up to the dogma:
“Global Warming is Caused by Man”. Those who disagree are ‘mavericks’ or
‘barking’. A bad sign.
I now believe that the whole thing is a self-perpetuating con, with the
purpose of extracting taxes and exercising control over the populace. The
moral blackmail is designed to make heretics feel guilty: “Don’t you WANT to
save the planet?”
Just for the record: I hate pollution, support recycling, and value clean
seas and countryside; and if I ever take up farming, it will be organic (and
I’m no tree-hugger). But the idea of Britain relying on wind turbines and
bicycles just as China has become the third biggest market for Rolls Royce,
is muddle-headed.
I suggest that “Global Warming Caused by Man” is all about taxing and
controlling us, and needs to be challenged constantly. But even if you
disagree, at least acknowledge the possibility. As for “backfiring cows”
let’s both consign that to the trashcan.
Brought to you
by guilt free recycled pixels - No trees were harmed in the making of this
Blog
The Notting Hillbillies come to
town
Back in 1967 there was a pub in Exeter’s North Street, a real gold mine. One
weekend the owner, “Sid”, took nearly £1,500 across the bar. Serious money
for those days. But when “Sid” retired, the new owner ignored his own core
customers and took just 18 months to wreck the business.
It still happens. Near the Devon village of Ashton, in the Teign Valley,
there was a wonderful old pub, with flagged floors, real ale, no music. The
very walls breathed history. But new people recently moved in and gutted the
place, obliterating the character, and turning it into a Notting Hill wine
bar. As one local commented: “Unbelievable”. After this stupid act of
vandalism, most people now shun the place, visiting other pubs in the
valley.
It’s the same story at Widdecombe-in-the-Moor, where an old inn used to be a
place of roaring fires, steaming dogs and a pleasant jumble of walkers and
families tucking into trencherman-sized lunches. But alas, no more. The pub
has been poncified and given the London treatment. Muddy boots unwelcome.
Three café latte’s please, and a soda water for Dominic.
The reason I’m droning on about vandalised watering holes is because they
all ignored their core customer base and then paid the price. Tory leader
David Cameron is making exactly the same mistake, converting the
Conservative ‘local’ into a Notting Hill wine bar, complete with lava lamps
and ‘conceptual art’; something that is shallow, and therefore transient. Mr
Cameron forgets (or does not care) that voters and party members can always
drink elsewhere.
Cheers
On the Lamm
This is a shortened version of a lecture given in Washington DC in November
2006, by Dick Lamm, former governor of Colorado. Even if you disagree you
might be interested in reading an opposing viewpoint (unless, of course, you
have entirely succumbed to political correctness).
Lamm said: “If you believe that America is too smug, too self-satisfied, too
rich; then let’s destroy America. It’s not that hard. Arnold Toynbee
observed that ‘an autopsy of history would show that all great nations
commit suicide’. Here is how to do it…
First, turn America into a multilingual and bicultural country. No nation
can survive the tension and conflict of two competing languages or cultures.
It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however it is a curse
for a society to be bilingual.
Second, invent ‘multiculturalism’ and encourage immigrants to maintain their
culture. Celebrate diversity, rather than emphasising our similarities. Make
it an article of belief that all cultures are equal and that black and
Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the
majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.
My next point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and
businesses to give these efforts a lot of money. I would invest in
‘victimology’ and start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on
the majority population. And I would place all subjects off limits; make it
taboo to talk against the cult of ‘diversity’. I would find a word similar
to ‘heretic’ in the 16th Century – that stopped discussion and paralysed
thinking. Words like ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobe’ halt discussion and debate. And
I would enforce a mantra: that because immigration has been good for
America, it must always be good.’
Governor Lamm resumed his seat in silence. Every American in that room knew
that everything he had said was proceeding methodically, quietly, darkly,
yet pervasively.
It all sounds horribly familiar to what has happened here at home.
A diverse view
Junk Mail
Nobody benefits from a Postal Strike, but the recent dispute at the Royal
Mail Sorting Office in Exeter is an ongoing part of the destruction of our
postal system by the European Union.
The Post Office was that rare thing, a nationalised industry that actually
made money. And yes, it was a monopoly, and the better for it. A letter
posted in London, addressed to elsewhere in London, subsidised a letter
posted in Penzance going to John O’Groats. The system worked well, and acted
as part of the social glue that held the country together (along with the
network of sub-post offices in towns and villages across the land.)
But then along came Brussels and demanded the “liberalisation” of postal
services. This has resulted in private firms such as TNT cherry-picking the
most profitable parts like city deliveries, and leaving poor old Royal Mail
with the scrag-end. How can it possibly deliver a letter from Redruth to
Stornaway for 22p and still make a profit? It can’t, of course. And it is
entirely due to the European Union telling us how to run our postal service.
The Labour Government has done its bit, of course. Pensions and TV licences
have been taken away from the sub-post offices, which are now closing
throughout the country. And there are now proposals from Brussels that VAT
will be charged on post, making it 17.5% more expensive (but then VAT was a
present to us from Brussels when we joined in the 1970s, so we shouldn’t be
too surprised).
As for the postmen, UKIP is 100% behind their attempt to maintain a First
Class postal system and we wish them well in their endeavours. But they are
fighting not just Royal Mail bosses who are themselves on the rack, but also
Brussels and the Labour Government. Perhaps next time we have a General
Election all those postal workers will remember that simple fact, and start
supporting political parties that really do care about Her Majesty’s Post
Office, and the creation of a professional and dedicated postal team; not
one composed of students and agency workers many of whom couldn’t give a
stuff whether the mail gets there or not.
1st class blog posting
Little things for small minds
Every now and again I realise that God has a great sense of humour and is
looking down on this world, studying the race He created, and chuckling to
Himself at the absurdities of which we are capable. I don’t mean the big
things; the wars, the famines, etc. I mean the small things; the petty things.
Take Adam Pressman, a menswear manager in Exeter. He was having a drink in a
city wine bar when he went outside for a hand-rolled cigarette. He finished
the cigarette, dropped it, put it out with his foot. He was immediately fined
£75 by a waiting Litter Enforcement Officer who had been watching him. I do
not condone littering, but even a speeding ticket is only £60, and the
hate-war that is being waged against otherwise law-abiding smokers is actually
driving people out into the street where ashtrays are not exactly plentiful.
And you can bet your last euro that the City Councils won’t put the same
effort into tackling the burger/fried chicken-and-vomit wrappers littering the
city streets on a Friday and Saturday night; too much of a possibility that
some drunken yob will lay one on the Litter Enforcement staff, so the
authorities will concentrate on the easy targets, those who drop a
bio-degradable cigarette butt in their lunch hour. In 2004 these anti-smoking
measures were being pushed through the EU Parliament, (That’s right, it’s
Brussels again. Couldn’t you guess?). Three of UKIP’s MEPs attended a lunch
there. At the end of the meal those on the top table sat back, pushed away
their pudding plate and lit up cigarettes. Graham Booth MEP interrupted them:
“Excuse me, Gentlemen, but haven’t you seen the notice?” He indicated the NO
SMOKING sign literally above their heads… Their response was: “Oh, get a
life!” And this from a bunch of politicians in Brussels who had just voted on
legislation affecting British smokers. This hypocrisy is like rotten mackerel
by moonlight; it shines and stinks. Sorry, but it’s time we governed
ourselves.
Blowing away the smoke
Are you thinking what Ollie and
Bob are thinking? A public meeting in Dorchester on the 8th September
organised by the Campaign for an Independent Britain under the title
-"Conservative Party Policy - Does membership of the EU benefit the United
Kingdom?"
The Coven were in Dorchester the other night to witness Blue-Labour and the
art of stonewalling.
Conservatives, Roger Helmer
MEP and Oliver Letwin the MP for the West Dorset Constituency set out their
views and recommendations on Britain's present and future relations with the
European Union. Mr Harry Randall chaired the Meeting.
Helmer:
Based on his experiences as an MEP, Mr Helmer described the ways in which the
EU operated and its objectives.
The allegedly free market of the EU was an illusion, what was in place was a
"customs union". This being an outdated concept related primarily to the
nineteenth century. The EU had developed free trade arrangements with a large
number of countries and there was no reason why Britain, if out of the EU,
could not similarly have a free trade agreement thus avoiding all the detailed
regulations imposed on British industry in all its activities and not just
those relating to trade with the EU. It was indicative of the EU's approach on
trade that there were no free trade agreements with the "Anglo-Saxon "
countries - for example, the United States, Canada, Australia, and New
Zealand. The "elite" in control of the European Union were determined to
continue to achieve their objective of a political union of the countries in
the EU. The proposed Constitution of the EU, the adoption of which originally
required the ratification of each of the members of the EU, was effectively
"still on the cards" in that various schemes were under consideration for its
adoption including resubmitting it for ratification in a slightly different
form but, to all intents and purposes, with exactly the same provisions and
objectives of the original. In the meantime, the Commission, effectively
without authority, was pushing ahead with various proposals relating to the
provisions of the Constitution as if it had been ratified and was ignoring the
"No" votes in the French and Dutch referendums. There could be no question of
Britain achieving any effective reforms within the EU and in almost every
respect, (constitutional and economic), it was in Britain's best interests to
leave the EU as soon as possible.
Letwin
At the beginning of his address, Letwin stated that he could not speak with
the same forcefulness as Mr Helmer and that he agreed with many of the
detailed points made by Mr Helmer about the deficiencies of the EU. He didn't
attempt to describe in detail any of the benefits that he might believe the
United Kingdom derives from its membership of the EU but he thought that
various matters could not be tackled by Britain on its own. He said that
Britain needed membership of the EU to develop an effective policy to counter
climate change and global warming and because of the advantages obtained by
Britain as part of a heavyweight trading bloc in negotiations with other
countries. Letwin advocated that Britain should continue as a member of the EU
and most of his speech was related to the future reform of the EU with Britain
playing a leading role in that. He did not accept Helmer's view that the
"elite" in the EU would continue or be able to continue with their programme
of complete political union of the countries in the EU. He thought that the
costs of Britain's membership as noted by Mr Helmer, were "not significant".
He had an open mind about whether or not there should be a referendum on the
question of Britain's membership of the EU yet thought an ongoing debate on an
"in or out" question was a waste of time. The country as a whole should
support Britain's membership so that those representing Britain in the EU
could effectively speak with complete authority. The EU was changing and it
was counter-productive to look back to the difficulties of two or three years
ago in considering reform; the approach must be to see what could be achieved
in the future. This would present very different problems because of the
enlargement of the EU that would provide the positive opportunity for its
effective reform in which Britain should play a significant and constructive
role. That reform might well entail a partial reversion to the concept of
inter-governmental co-operation as opposed to supra-national control by a
European State.
Comments from the Coven:
The Wizard: Helmer's speech was clear-cut which is to be expected with
his knowledge of the EU and all its intricacies. By comparison, Letwin's
speech faltered on occasion. He could hardly counter the adverse points made
by Helmer, so chose to concentrate on a future eutopia based in blind faith
rather than reality. He was either unprepared or knew he had no real arguments
other than the Tory party line to rebut Helmer argument. The enlargement of
the EU including the accession of Turkey is Tory policy. In believing that EU
enlargement, creating even more problems in his rose tinted future is an
'opportunity' for Britain, indicates that he is living in the parallel
universe of the career politician. "He doesn't believe a word he has been
saying" was just one of the comments heard after the meeting. The
Conservatives are desperate to gain control of the government but strangely
not so desperate as to upset their love affair with the European Union. They
think that by continually putting forward the esoteric waffle as presented by
Letwin, they can fool the Tory voter whilst aligning themselves closer to the
policies of the Liberal-Democrats.
The Warlock:
Deeply disappointing performance in Dorset last night to an audience of about
140. The Ollie & Helmer double act is a 'good cop bad cop routine' where they
get closer together with ' lots of common ground between us.' Really? Helmer
opened with an impressive presentation for coming out. Letwin trotted out the
usual scenario for staying in. Deeply disappointing in part as the Chairman
missed ensuring the pair answered or fully answered the questions. No chance
of debate or to re-visit the question once an answer had been given. Not
surprisingly, both rejected the idea of a referendum on coming out of the EU
on the basis that the vote might be to stay in. Unbelievable, but that was
what they both clearly said. (Can you ever really trust or believe a so-called
Tory Eurosceptic?). Perhaps the comment in the Spy column in the Daily
Telegraph, about Helmer's position had more insight than I had realised?
Spy Quote: "United they stand
Earlier this year David Cameron made it clear that he views the growing number
of Tory parliamentarians who wish to withdraw from the EU as an irritation,
declaring that none of them would be allowed frontbench jobs. It is intriguing
to discover that the Tory policy chief, Oliver Letwin, will tonight be
engaging with one of those supporters of the Better Off Out campaign, East
Midlands MEP Roger Helmer, at a meeting in Dorchester. "I was invited to
debate against Oliver, but I was insistent that I was not prepared to debate
against a fellow Conservative," Helmer tells me. "Still, I'm more than happy
to share a platform with him to discuss European issues. We will probably have
slightly different nuances of position, but both within broadly Conservative
viewpoints." I Would love the opportunity to have a proper debate head to head
with some of these professionals who are still maintaining, like Oliver
Letwin, that the EU can be changed from within."
The Witch: Oliver was quite pathetic tonight. I think a lot of the
Conservatives must have been very disappointed with his speech. He was very
hesitant, and although I have heard him speak many times, tonight was one of
the worst speeches I have heard him make. Not just from the content, but in
the delivery. Roger Helmer, whilst being a member of the "Better Off Group"
was keeping his options open, saying he was still a conservative and that he
and Oliver had a lot in common. Oliver stated quite openly that he didn't want
to leave the EU, that he thought they (the Tories) would be able to reform it,
and that since enlargement, the EU was moving their way as some of the new
members were like Britain and didn't want an EU Super State. He openly
approved of immigration, and when someone in the audience said that
Birmingham, where he came from, had changed beyond recognition as 33% were of
ethnic origin, he didn't think that was at all bad and couldn't see that the
nation was in danger of losing it's identity. A few in the audience agreed
with him, but I think most were shocked that he couldn't or wouldn't recognise
what was happening to our country. Someone said that it was a question of
numbers, that we were a small overcrowded island, and we were losing control
because we were no longer in control of our own borders. Oliver thought we
needed a sensible immigration policy. On the whole, Roger got the biggest
applause, people were polite to Oliver, but I noticed he beat a hasty retreat
when it was over. He openly said that he thought most people would disagree
with his view, which they did. A lot of people signed Roger's petition to
leave the EU. I think Oliver was very brave to stand up and defend the EU,
whilst admitting there were problems, he seemed to think that things were
moving away from a supranational state, towards a loose collaboration between
countries. Roger said they were still pushing for integration. Roger Helmer
wants to regain the Tory whip because he says he won't be able to stand as a
Conservative in the EU elections if the whip is not reinstated. He is
completely out of step with the Cameroons, so I don't know if they were
restore the whip. Oliver was clearly very unhappy about tonight's meeting, and
was sticking to the Party line in spite of the opposition in the hall.
Contributions
by the 'Coven'
Return to sender
There's been quite a lot in the
press about Royal Mail's new pricing scheme taking into account size and
shape as well as weight, "Size Based Pricing" - now called "Pricing in
Proportion", or "Pip". It's worth pointing out that when this was being
discussed between Royal Mail and Postcomm a couple of years ago, it was made
clear that Royal Mail wanted to do this largely because of the requirements of
the
EU Postal Directive 97/67/EC, and in particular because of their
interpretation of Article 12 of that Directive which says that "prices must be
geared to costs". Whether they were right or wrong with that interpretation,
and whether it's a good idea or a bad idea, are moot points.
The EU Postal Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15
December 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of
Community postal services and the improvement of quality of service."
Article 12 states that Member States shall take steps to ensure that the
tariffs for each of the services forming part of the provision of the
universal service comply with the following principles:
1. Prices must be affordable and must be such that all users have access to
the services provided,
2. Prices must be geared to costs; Member States may decide that a uniform
tariff should be applied throughout their national territory,
3. The application of a uniform tariff does not exclude the right of the
universal service provider(s) to conclude individual agreements on prices with
customers,
4.Tariffs must be transparent and non-discriminatory."
Royal Mail’s case for
change
Royal Mail believes SBP will bring its pricing structure more into line with
the costs it incurs for processing different types of mail. In particular,
Royal Mail considers that items that cannot be machine sorted or take up more
space in mailbags, incur more costs to handle than those items that can. The
items in the former category tend to be large letters (‘flats’) and packets.
Conversely, Royal Mail believes that current prices for heavier weight items
are significantly in excess of the cost of handling these items. This, in
part, reflects historical factors such as a desire to limit price increases on
the basic weight step, which include the ‘headline’ prices for first and
second class public tariffs.
Royal Mail also believes its SBP proposal is a necessary step to prepare it to
face increasing competition. Royal Mail has not felt the need to improve the
cost reflectivity of its pricing structure until now. This might be because it
has benefited from a monopoly over a large part of the UK postal market, and
therefore, faced very limited competitive pressures. The European Postal
Directive’s requirements to liberalise European postal markets coupled with
Postcomm’s market opening strategy are making material changes to the market
in which Royal Mail is operating. Postcomm’s market opening strategy means
that by April 2007 at the latest, the last elements of Royal Mail’s monopoly
over the UK letters market will have been removed and the market will be fully
open to competition. Royal Mail believes that SBP meets the need for more cost
reflective pricing that is identified within the European Directive and is one
of the criteria in Paragraph 13 of Condition 19 of its licence, against which
the SBP proposal will be assessed.
Royal Mail believes that its present pricing structure could distort the
development of competition. This may happen if competitors are encouraged to
attack their artificially high profit margins for heavier weight items more
than has been the case in the past (items weighing more than 350g and/ or
costing more than £1 have been open to competition since 1981). It might also
happen if competitors are discouraged from offering rival products for
customers using lighter flats and packets services because the available
profit margins are suppressed, as is arguably the case today.
Royal Mail also believes that its proposal will make it simpler and easier for
consumers and small businesses to post mail. Royal Mail argues it will be
simpler because there will be fewer price points and it will be easier because
most mail will be able to be priced by sight rather than requiring the use of
weighing scales.
Royal Mail has also noted that a number of postal operators in other countries
have price structures that take account of size. These countries include
Australia, Canada, Japan, the USA and some European countries.
Posted by the Purple
Postman
Bureaucrats rattled
by democratic protest
Protestors rattled bureaucrats both inside and out at SEERA’s meeting on the
12th July at the Town Hall, Hove. It is an important venue because it is
Labour dominated and Councillor Don Turner is a very senior member of the
Labour Party. He is also Chairman of Housing for Brighton and Hove and the new
Deputy Chairman of SEERA.
On arrival Europhile Members were robustly heckled traversing the steps to the
entrance by George Norton, Nick Jack, Terry Kendal and others with shouts of
“unelected, undemocratic and unwanted”, leaving them shaken. Overheard was a
remark “For God’s sake. I attend these meetings all over the country and you
are by far the rowdiest!” Well done chaps!
Inside the hall the Chairman of SEERA made the mistake of asking whether
anyone else had anything to say. Jean Allison from East Worthing had something
to say, and standing up with banner in hand she told them what she thought of
SEERA, its lack of democracy, the housing numbers, and that they should have a
good look at themselves and what they are doing - after which they threw her
out. What a wonderful lady!
Her actions must have fired up many Councillors who vociferously opposed GOSE/SEEDA’S
“Diamonds” project. Even the Chairman, Keith Mitchell, condemned it.
Meanwhile outside there was great activity from a stall at the entrance to the
Town Hall and another on the corner of the main road; Steve Harris’ UKIP
balloon was situated in prime position and Victor Webb, speaking on a
microphone, commandeered a busy junction island while many supporters on the
pavement held banners. Almost every passer-by took a leaflet.
Later Dave Capon drove around the busiest routes with Victor still loudly
expounding truths about SEERA, housing numbers, the EU influence, and that 2.5
million tons of London’s rubbish is to be exported to Sussex generating 20,000
lorry trips per annum. At Brighton Pier, site due for massive development,
people stopped to listen, gazing at the van with its banners aloft.
At lunchtime Lib Dem Councillors came out to squabble with Margaret Carroll,
Ferne and Bill Abbott and others, proving they were rattled.
In fact squabbles occurred throughout and some presumed Council employees, who
had earlier gathered our information sheets, were so agitated that they
abandoned work and sat watching from a nearby wall. Eventually, unnoticed,
they took down some of our banners which were quickly reinstated. Clearly our
sign “SEERA, WHERE EU QUANGOS MEET TO CHEAT”, rendered them almost spitting
with anger. One individual had a triangle tattooed on the back of his neck.
(At least 2 of us received parking tickets and prior to that these people were
seen talking to a traffic warden).
The BBC (Southern), Radio 4 and The Argus local paper all attended. We
appeared briefly in the 6.0pm news and were mentioned early on Radio 4 on
Saturday 15th.
Absolutely brilliant effort by ALL of those present. You are the BEST at this
in the country….even our opposition admits it! Great stuff - we’ll have them
licked yet.
Despatched by our roving rodent
Law Contortions could cost Inland
Revenue millions
A High Court 'Parking Ticket Judgment' could create a tax windfall for
businesses as Justice Collins decision in the High Court could lead to a 'fine
mess' for the Inland Revenue.
Mr Justice Collins decided last week that parking tickets are not fines but
'civil responsibilities' and this judgment means that businesses can claim
that all such 'responsibilities' are allowable expenses. because they are no
longer considered to be fines. Businesses all over the country are consulting
their tax specialists and there appears to be a majority opinion that the
decision of Justice Collins will now cost the Inland Revenue millions of
pounds, because businesses can now offset their parking 'responsibilities'
against taxes due to be paid.
The High Court case was brought on 5th July 2006 by Robin De Crittenden in an
application to strike down decriminalised parking fines because there is
conflict with the constitutional provisions enshrined in the Bill of
Rights...which says that no-one can be fined except by a court. Decriminalised
Parking does not allow access to a court and De Crittenden argues that this is
unconstitutional. The Bill of Rights was confirmed in the Metric Martyrs High
Court Judgment in 2002 as being a constitutional statute of major importance.
However, what was witnessed in the High Court last week was worthy of Humpty
Dumpty but not very worthy of a High Court Judge. Read the Sunday Telegraph
report of the case here
The crux of Justice Collin's decision was that parking tickets are not fines
but 'civil responsibilities.' Judge Collins stated that the Adjudicators and
Local Authorities could now 'breathe a collective sigh of relief' as
De Crittendens' case was 'without merit.'
This decision has now opened up a massive can of worms for the Inland Revenue
and has created a huge embarrassment for the Government - Perhaps the
adjudicators and the local authorities should be prepared to hold their
collective breath a little longer.
This is because the Inland Revenue site states:
NIM05630 - Class 1 NICs : Expenses and allowances : Car parking fines
"Fines for illegal parking are not allowable business expenses. Any payment
which an employer makes towards the cost of fines incurred by an employee, and
for which they are liable, should be included in gross pay for Class 1 NICs
purposes."
The Government's own website,
DirectGov gives advice on 'Paying and Appealing
Parking Fines' with links to, and therefore implicating, EVERY local
authority.
Robin de Crittenden is a most unlikely and very unwilling Knight on a White
Horse for the Cause of the Inland Revenue or the Government...but nonetheless,
he is looking forward to a seat in the House of Lords as his reward for doing
battle with Judge Humpty Dumpty. An appeal against Judge Collins' decision was
lodged at the Court of Appeal yesterday.
If the Court of Appeal overturns the Collins decision and confirms the
position now being taken by Robin De Crittenden; the Government and the Inland
Revenue's - that parking tickets are fines - then we are back to the position
that the Bill of Rights forbids all fines or forfeitures without conviction...
AND...if that is the case then Decriminalised Parking falls and a £1.2 billion
a year 'Parking Industry' falls with it.
From the mighty martyrs
Historical Perspectives
Back in the Fourth Century AD hundreds of thousands of Goth refugees were
driven westwards by the Huns. The Roman Empire, aghast at this tidal wave of
humanity, granted them asylum in Turkey. But this was a mistake, because in
AD376 those same Goths then poured across the Danube in rafts, boats, and
hollowed-out tree trunks. Awaiting them on the riverbank were corrupt Roman
officials, who let them pass through to the Empire in return for payment in
gold.
The historian Ammianus
Marcellinus - serving as a frontier soldier at the time - wrote about the
event years later: “Diligent care was taken that no future destroyer of the
Roman State should be left behind, even if he were smitten with a fatal
disease. With such stormy eagerness on the part of insistent men was the ruin
of the Roman world brought in”.
Our present asylum and
immigration system (dominated by EU law and the Human Rights Act signed by
Tony Blair in 1997) has uncanny echoes of that long-gone Roman world,
especially the sense of disbelief among the populace at what is happening.
Today we are unable to deport Afghan terrorist hi-jackers who have had their
asylum appeals denied (and remember that Afghanistan is now a democracy).
Furthermore, convicted EU
citizens cannot be deported from Britain at the end of their sentence because
that contravenes their free movement throughout the Union. There are currently
12 million more National Insurance numbers in the UK system than there are
people. One unsubstantiated source (claiming to be from within the Dept of
Work & Pensions itself) informs me that in fact there is a total of
120-million NI numbers in existence. Given that in our population of
70-million, perhaps 50-million are likely to have a number, the figure of
120-million seems incredible………and therefore is very possibly true.
Since 2003 untold thousands of illegal immigrants were granted tax credits by
the Inland Revenue when their asylum application had been rejected, all
because we need low-paid street-sweepers. Call me pernickety but this is not
an immigration policy. It’s a dog’s breakfast.
When the Government (or
even a Tory government) blathers away about crime, immigration, or terrorism,
remember that they have already surrendered control to Brussels, which now
makes 80% of our laws. They have cornered the market in hot air and
incompetence.
Ammianus Marcellinus must
be looking down, shaking his head, and smiling wearily.
Dug by the Archaeologist
Lefty Lexicon
(A translation of the left
leaning vernacular started by Inigo Wilson which we will add to over time)
A
Agenda - describes any collection of policies: 'equality agenda' for instance.
Invariably needs to be ‘taken forward’.
Aggressive outreach - the process of actively soliciting trade for social
workers. Generally employed when 'customers' fail to show required enthusiasm
for services on offer.
B
Beacon of excellence - archaism: any organ of state that achieved - or
'delivered' - what it was supposed to.
Best practice - normally 'established' when a Lefty wants to saddle a process
with more complexity. Replaces 'working it out yourself'.
C
Child-centred - education: "we can't be bothered to teach them… perhaps
they’ll do it themselves".
Class - grouping people by the contents of their wallet rather than, say, how
they think, feel or behave as individuals.
Consultation - a formal system for ignoring public views while patronising
them at the same time. London's Congestion Charge for instance.
Community leader - someone plucked from obscurity to represent ‘the views of
the community’ for the purposes of ‘consultation’. NB never elected to this
position.
Critique - media, academia: same as 'rebuttal'. When a Lefty alleges that
someone's writing is 'riddled with factual inaccuracies' then mysteriously
fails to identify any.
D
Debate - as in "we welcome a debate". Means keep talking while
we ignore you.
Delivery - as in "delivered against targets". Means 'achieve'.
Disproportionate - foreign affairs: Describes any act by USA or Israel.
Delegitimise - what we do if we suggest that a favoured Lefty client group may
contain members who are not wholly beyond criticism as individuals.
Diversity - creating a workforce based on how people look rather than on their
skills or aptitude
E
Equal - as in ‘opportunities’: describes the desire to have a workforce
resemble the population it comes from, rather than matched to the task in
hand. See 'diversity'.
Egalitarian - “if I can’t have one, then neither can you”. Shared misery much
better than unevenly scattered joy.
F
Fascism/Nazism - apparently the 'opposite' of Socialism - despite sharing
party members, ideology and - in National Socialism - the name.
Fit for purpose - neither
G
Gender issues - grouping people by their sex rather than how they think, feel
or behave as individuals.
‘Green’ issues - “if we can’t control the means of production then we’ll close
it down”. NB. the US is the ‘biggest polluter in the world’ which is wholly
unrelated to the fact it’s the world’s most productive economy.
H
Hate-crime - same as 'normal' crime as far as victims are concerned - but much
more distressing for Lefties.
Hate-speech - "shut up!".
Human rights - using the legal system to pursue political ends.
I
Inclusive - Means 'drop entry standards until anyone can get in'.
Invest - tax, spend and waste huge amounts of public money
Impartial - media, BBC: the balance achieved by attacking the Opposition for
being Conservative and attacking the Government for being insufficiently
Lefty.
In partnership with… - Government: "this way, none of us get the blame when
nothing happens!".
Inappropriate - "I don't like this" - no explanation for what or whom must
ever be given.
Intolerance - Intolerance can only committed against certain defined groups of
people. These do not include, Americans, the middle class, white manual
workers, rural people, business and Christians obviously.
Institutional racism - 'racism' in a workforce that is achieved unknowingly
and in ways that cannot be specifically defined.
Islamophobic - anyone who objects to having their transport blown up on the
way to work.
Israel - see 'disproportionate' and 'legitimate grievances'. Country the size
of Wales, with 5m inhabitants, that is entirely responsible for any and all
delinquent Islamist behaviour the world over.
Issues around… - "I may be out of my depth here".
J
Justice - Government: as in ‘social justice’. Means taking money earned by the
general public to give to particular groups that Lefties approve of. Replaces
market economics.
Joined-up - adj. of government policies, targets or activities;
un-coordinated, inconsistent, determined by HM Treasury
K
Key - Government: most things are ‘key’, in particular ‘drivers’, ‘learnings’,
‘deliverables’. In education, all school ‘stages’ are 'key'.
Legitimate grievances - foreign affairs: why we're all to blame for deranged
Islamists murdering people in the developed world.
Liaise - the day-to-day process of Lefty Government. Replaces 'work'.
Learnings - means 'lessons'.
M
Marx - a Victorian gentleman whose theories cannot be disproved by
observation, experience or factual evidence. See 'religion' and
'post-modernism'.
Multi-cultural - All culture is valid - unless Western in some way. Usually to
be 'celebrated' and always found to be 'vibrant'. See 'diversity'.
N
Nazi - informal: describes non-Lefty views and useful to link with people
Lefties don’t like. Thus Germany’s Nazi period is the only noteworthy
formative experience of Pope Benedict.
NGO - Non Governmental Organisation – the repository of all moral authority in
Lefty World and whose words and motives may never be questioned.
O
Organised labour - what Lefties used to be interested in.
P
Palestinians - archetype 'victims' no matter how many teenagers they murder in
bars and fast food outlets. Never responsible for anything they do – or done
in their name - because of 'root causes' or ‘legitimate grievances’.
Post-modern - modern French 'philosophical': literature claiming that no
account of events can be trusted. 'Texts' must be 'deconstructed' for their
hidden meanings - except those by post-modernists, to be taken at face value.
Post Democratic society - the modern word for dictatorship.
Progressive - describes ideas generally thought up around 40 years ago – that
still don't work.
Q
Al Qaeda - Muslim 'militants' who for some reason or other continue to kill
far more Muslims than people of any other faith.
R
Race issues - grouping people by their skin colour as opposed to how they
think, feel or behave as individuals.
Racist - means "shut up!" - and is much, much worse than being violent,
thoughtless or unkind. In fact, easily the worst crime ever conceived of.
Relevant - education: something badly written, with references to sex and full
of swear-words. Always better than literature by 'dead white people'.
Religion -
Christianity: irrational, dangerous belief that material things may not be the
principal motive behind human behaviour.
Judaism: most Israelis are Jewish, so probably 'intolerant'.
Islam: always needs to be 'understood'.
Root causes - foreign affairs: Usually need to be 'examined'. Belief in 'root
causes' reflects dogged Lefty habit of trying to see contemporary religious
issues through the prism of ‘class analysis’.
S
Skills-based - education: "teach the little ba**ards Microsoft Word or
something. They don't actually need to know anything…".
Social exclusion - where bad people, behaving badly, somehow became our fault.
South Africa - a national showcase for Lefty policies with a one-party state,
some of the worst crime levels in the world, tragic AIDS mortality and
declining economy.ragic
AIDS mortality and declining economy.
Stereotype - any attempt to describe the general characteristics of a group
favoured by Lefties.
Stakeholder - the modern word for comrade.
Stigmatise - what we do to anti-social people if we ask them to stop.
Subsidised art - art no one would buy.
Sustainability - how long you can fool all of the people most of
the time.
T
Take forward - use instead of 'do'.
Target - randomly selected topic, date and percentage, the more
precise but meaningless the better. For example "people will be 37.36% nicer
to each other at rural bus-stops by October 25th, 2014
Terrorist - no such thing. Only people suffering from ‘root causes’ and
‘legitimate grievances’.
Traffic Calming - creating hypertension in motorists
Transgressive - term of approval for anything 'challenging established values'
- but generally puerile, annoying and dumb.
U
Unilateral - media, BBC: used to describe any act by the United States in
furtherance of its national interest.
United Nations - the NGO of NGOs. All foreign policy has to be 'in partnership
with the UN and our European Allies', unless bombing Serbia - which requires
neither.
V
Victim - see ‘Terrorist’, ‘Palestinians’, ‘gender issues’, ‘race issues’ and
‘social exclusion’.
W
Workers - notional ‘class’ of people that Lefties once claimed to represent.
Now replaced by college lecturers, human rights lawyers, pressure group
employees, civil servants with 'liaise' in their job title - and other people
you would probably not want over for supper.
Hat tip - Inigo Wilson'
|
Who-Dunn-It?
In Autumn 2007 Bill Newton-Dunn (Lib Dem MEP) asked Brussels for 250,000
euros (£173,000) to promote an EU wide police force.
At their Lisbon Summit in October 2007 the EU signed a treaty establishing
the Eurogendfor (EU Gendarmerie) and Mr Newton-Dunn clearly wanted a slice
of the action…. This is predictable for a Lib Dem, but his UKIP opponent in
the East Midlands, Derek Clark MEP, issued an immediate press release: “I do
not wish to see Euro-cops, armed with a handgun and legal immunity
swaggering around the East Midlands with a European Arrest Warrant from a
European prosecutor ready to drag one of my constituents back to a country
for a crime that may not even exist in the UK. I will be voting against
Newton-Dunn’s scheme.”
Shortly afterwards Bob Spink (Tory MP at the time, but now UKIP) stood up in
Westminster and asked the Foreign Secretary: “Will you give an assurance
that this paramilitary force will not be allowed to operate on British
soil?”
Setting aside his milkshake, wiping his mouth, and standing up, David
Milliband replied that he could give no such assurance. Eurogendfor had to
be invited into any country by its government..
As Bob Spink said: “This gives no confidence at all to the British people,
since we know from experience that we cannot trust this government. I note
that they haven’t ruled out giving permission for Eurogendfor to enter
Britain, for instance during the 2012 Olympic Games.”
Still going to vote for one of these Brussels-friendly parties?
Euro-goons-r-us
Spring Bulbs
They call them ‘light-bulb moments’… (St Paul had one on the road to
Damascus), the moment when realisation hits and the scales suddenly fall
from your eyes. For Roger Knapman MEP (former leader of UKIP) it happened in
1985, shortly before he was elected as a Conservative MP. He was in Germany
at the time, as guest of the Konrad Adeneur Stiftung (Foundation).
Along with other British visitors, Roger was observing 6,000 NATO forces on
military manoeuvres on the bleak North German Plain. It was a cold day, with
a damp mist rolling in across the battlefield, obscuring the action. As time
wore on the observers gradually lost the feeling in their toes, so the
Bundswehr Colonel invited them into the nearby officer’s mess for ‘a little
something’…
Over a glass of colourless liquid the visitors gradually thawed out. As the
others talked with the officers, Roger looked around the mess. He noticed a
big coloured map fixed to the wall: “EUROPE OF THE REGIONS”, with 116
‘regions’ listed, stretching right across Europe, from Portugal to Poland,
from Finland to the toe of Italy. Yet barely anyone in Britain at the time
had ever heard of ‘regions’. This was an eye-opener.
We all have our light-bulb moments. For Roger Knapman it came in 1985. I
wonder when you’ll have yours.
Flick that switch
Pay days
The world is mad. I’ve always suspected it. Now here’s the proof, courtesy
of Richard Littlejohn (You Couldn’t Make it Up, 18/12/2007)
The Home Office is giving illegal immigrants grants of £4,000 each to go
home and set up a business. An ostrich farm in Iran, an Albanian vineyard, a
fish farm in Angola, a shoe factory in China, and a beauty salon in
Zimbabwe.
An undercover reporter from a Sunday newspaper turned up at the
International Organisation of Migration and told them he’d been living here
illegally for 11 years, selling drugs, and now wanted to return to India to
open a travel agency, to help illegal immigrants come to Britain. The
official didn’t bat an eyelid, and promised him a grant of £4,000 to pay for
his flight, a car, office equipment, and three months salary for two
employees.
As Mr Littlejohn explains: “The scheme is being advertised in foreign
language newspapers. There’s nothing to prevent anyone turning up on a day
trip to London, claiming to have been here for years and volunteering to go
home in exchange for a grant to open a tattoo parlour in Tirana.”
Among other enterprises funded by your hard-earned taxes are a car
dealership in Kenya, an Islamic dress shop in Sudan, a ferry in the Congo, a
vehicle repair shop in Kosovo, and a farm in Armenia. The bill has reached
£36 million. By the time you read this, it will be far more. Please remember
this, next time you’re writing out that cheque for the Poll Tax. And
remember which political parties are so consumed by political correctness
that they support this appalling crassness.
Business as usual
Bog-of
Politics can be rough. In Parliament it is said that you face your
opponents, but your real enemies are sitting behind you. Winning a seat is
difficult. Keeping it is harder. Eric Lubbock (now Lord Avebury) remarked
wryly: “In 1962 the wise, far-seeing people of Orpington elected me as their
member. In 1970 the fools threw me out.” Even if you gain power you are
constantly at the mercy of “events”. Opposition is a luxury where you can
promise the earth, safe in the knowledge that you’ll never have to deliver;
but it comes as a bit of a shock if you win unexpectedly. This happened last
year in Israel when the Palestinians turned away from Fatah and voted for
Hamas. There was panic in the Hamas camp when they suddenly realised that
they now had to start running the place, not just indulge themselves by
shouting in the streets, spraying bullets into the air with an AK47 (I’ve
often wondered where all those bullets land, but that’s for another time).
It’s not quite the Gaza strip, but Gordon Brown is about to learn how tough
politics can get. He is trying to stuff the renamed EU Constitution through
Parliament without asking the people in a referendum (breaking a solemn
promise that helped get him elected). This is bad enough, but his hated
Treaty will mean that Britain gets the Euro Currency. Before the inevitable
cries of “Codswallop” may I quote from Article 3 of the Treaty: “The Union
shall establish an economic and monetary union whose currency is the euro.”
It then expresses the desire of: “ever closer co-ordination of economic
policies… pending the euro becoming the currency of all Member States of the
Union.” No wriggle room for Gordon Brown there. Vote for the Treaty and get
the Euro as an extra. In other words Buy One Get One Free!
Funny money
Drink up
“There’s nothing wrong with your fruitcake, Mother. It’s just that I have to
drive home, and after your sherry trifle I’ll be way over the limit”. You
might think this extreme. But think again. The Government is considering
plans to lower the blood /alcohol limit by almost half, to 50 milligrams in
100 millilitres of blood. One pint of ale could easily take you over the
threshold.
If the smoking ban wasn’t enough to kill off the pub trade, these proposals
will bang another handful of nails into the coffin lid. New Labour dislikes
pubs, because they contain people who gather and exchange politically
incorrect views – and sometimes…(this may shock you)…sometimes they might
even agree that New Labour couldn’t run a party in a brewery. And that will
never do.
Of course drink driving is a crime and should be punished. Last year 540
people died in drink-related accidents, a tragedy for all involved. But it
is impossible to eliminate all risks from life, whether in a conker fight or
having a quiet pint in a public bar - unless we ban conkers, motorists and
pubs. Don’t laugh. Under the cultural Marxists running this country it could
happen sooner than you’d think.
There’s another angle to this. Those pushing to lower the alcohol limit,
say: “This will bring us into line with most countries in the European
Union.” And that, ladies and gentlemen, is the real thinking behind this.
Hadn’t you guessed?
Drowning in sorrow
Van man turns white
We all value clean air, but Ken Livingstone, London Mayor, has produced a
stinker called “The Low Emission Zone for Greater London”. In fairness it
means well: the aim is to improve air quality in the capital city. But if you
have a modest little vehicle - say a 7.5 tonne diesel van a few years old but
still sailing through the MOT – you’ll soon have to pay £200 a day to enter
London. Don’t blame Livingstone. Blame the Government for letting him get away
with it… First, what is the point in having a national MOT if Baron Ken can
ignore it inside his own fiefdom?… Second, if he’s allowed to impose his own
rules, it’s probable that future “elected Mayors” will follow suit. Gordon
Brown won’t like that. In the words of the song: “There could be trouble
ahead”… Third, at £200 a day for a van, a typical 250-day year would cost
£50,000, so old vehicles will need to be replaced by new. Think of the massive
pollution caused by manufacturing them (but the old ones will still be on the
M25 and beyond)... Finally, the DVLA will need to inform vehicle owners to
avoid London or incur a penalty. This is ongoing, constant, and expensive…. As
one traffic commentator said: “It is typical of New Labour’s uncoordinated
thinking. With the zeal of the convert, they have failed to take account of
practicality or good sense”. The only thing to add is that Boris Johnson (Tory
remember) would probably be just as bad as Red Ken.
Facing the music
Fixing the drips
If your plumber starts giving you pensions advice, tell him: “Leaking taps,
yes. Pensions advice, no, thanks”…
Some people can’t help meddling. Take Lord Justice Sedley, one of our most
left-wing judges. He wants the whole UK population to have its DNA recorded on
the police national database…. Justice Sedley is a former Communist – his old
chambers, Cloisters, were known as ‘the Kremlin’. In the 1970s he even tutored
at the Communist University in London. It seems to me that he should stick to
the day job, not try to introduce new laws suitable for George Orwell’s vision
of the future. Needless to say, UKIP is totally opposed to his proposals and
will fight them while we draw breath…
The other recent example is Lord Malloch Brown recommending that Britain
should surrender its seat on the UN Security Council. He stated in Brussels
that he is a “huge fan of the European Union having just one place at the
international table. I think it will go in stages, institution by institution.
It is not going to happen with a bang”. But he wants it to happen “as quickly
as possible”. …
The problem here is that Malloch Brown is a top government adviser, yet his
language deliberately undermines Britain’s independence. In another age, this
would be called treason and he could have been locked in the Tower, deservedly
so in my opinion - he can be grateful for a more enlightened age. But this is
not just a case of one man’s personal opinion; this really matters because he
is employed to advise our Prime Minister….
As William Hague said: “It is alarming that Gordon Brown has chosen to put in
charge of UN reform the man who thinks we should give up our UN Security
Council seat to the EU”…. I agree with William Hague. Personally I’d rather
give my plumber the job. At least he could handle any leaks.
On the record
Running on empty
Alistair Campbell was New Labour’s master of spin. In his diaries he
describes the way they approached things. He and Blair instinctively knew,
instinctively recognised, that the Great Britain of 1997 had lapped up Big
Brother and Pop Idol, celebrating celebrity for its own sake. Britain didn’t
want a leader. It wanted a cuddle. The message was “Vote Labour – we’re nicer
than that horrible lot”. New Labour’s media approach was more Richard & Judy,
than Newsnight or Panorama. As biographer Stephen Pollard wrote recently:
“Nothing illustrates how perfectly suited the fundamental shallowness of New
Labour was to the modern electorate than the one occasion when Blair ignored
its triviality, in the aftermath of 9/11. He was firm on Iraq….And he was
repaid with a kick in the political groin by an electorate for which such
things are far too troubling to be thinking about. [Alistair Campbell] has
exposed, unwittingly, the deliberate emptiness at the heart of New Labour –
and at the heart of a Britain which lapped it up”. Mr Pollard is a gifted
writer, and I think he has a point (even if Iraq has become a near-total
disaster). We get the politicians we deserve. It seems that back in 1997 much
of Britain wanted to be governed by nannies, treated like imbeciles. The
downside is that 300,000 Britons fled abroad last year, mostly to Australia
and other Commonwealth countries. This is such a terrible waste of the very
people - the entrepreneurs- needed to get us back on our feet once we leave
the EU and start repairing the huge damage it has wrought upon our country.
Cut and run
Rally Round
John Prescott once said: “The Green belt is a Labour achievement, and we
mean to build on it”, but it’s a cheap shot on my part. Prescott was only
there as a fig leaf to Labour’s Working Class voters, and his gaffes are so
numerous that I (almost) feel guilty mentioning them. But while we’re at it,
my favourite is what he’s meant to have said after a rough flight: “It’s great
to be back on terra cotta”. I’m sorry. I’ll stop it. The reason for mentioning
Prescott is that there is a vast difference between him and Gordon Brown, who
is a clever, hard-working and generally bright man. Idiots don’t become Prime
Minister… True, he has destroyed our pensions industry, so that anyone with
both cash and brains is now putting everything into property, but we’ll pass
on that for now. The point is that Gordon Brown is refusing to hold a
referendum on the renamed EU Treaty (read Constitution). At the time of
writing forty Labour MPs and four large Trades Unions are in revolt, along
with the Tories, UKIP, the Liberal Party, the CIB, and the cross-party
Democracy Movement (not to mention the Sun, the Daily Mail, and the Daily
Telegraph. Even the Guardian is starting to get in on the act). For Gordon
Brown to ignore this is a colossal mistake, beyond belief in its cack-handedness.
Prescott, yes. Brown, I would never have believed it. But it shows that he is
not his own man. I don’t know whose pocket he is in, but it sure isn’t ours,
or why break an election pledge?. On Sunday October 27th the Pro-Referendum
Rally will be holding a march in London. They need every person in Britain who
cares about this surrender of our sovereignty to come to the capital and
protest. It doesn’t matter whether you are Labour, Tory, UKIP, Lib Dem, even
George Galloway’s Respect Party. This is too important for petty political
differences. We are mobilising. For details please visit
www.proreferendumrally.co.uk
- or call UKIP on FREEPHONE 0800-587-6587 and we will pass you the
information. Think of it this way: at least it’ll make a change from your
usual Sunday!
Just do it
Moving Abroad?
If you want to move abroad to Afghanistan, Pakistan, Nigeria, Iraq etc, here
is the politically correct guide of how to do it….......Ignore immigration
quotas, visas, international law etc. Once you arrive, demand free medical
care for your family, and bilingual doctors, nurses, and teachers. Fly the
Union Jack from your car. Demand classes in British culture in the Muslim
school system. Speak only English at home, and insist that your children do
the same. Don’t stop there. You’ll need a driving licence, so show them your
existing UK document and demand a local equivalent. If they object, then shout
loudly enough and they will understand. Then drive around without car
insurance and ignore local traffic rules. When the locals complain (and they
will) organise protest marches against your host country, inciting violence
against the institutions of the country that originally let you in (the
government, police, TV c |